Search
Contact

Our clerks’ room is open between:

8.30am – 6.30pm

Outside of these hours and in cases of urgency, please contact
Paul Bunting on 07971 843023 or
Darren Madle on 07769 714399.

Clerk contacts

Richard Sheehan

Deputy Senior Clerk

020 7420 9503
Oliver Ventura

First Junior Clerk

020 7420 9505
Aron Hanks

Second Junior Clerk

020 7420 9506
Archie Conners

Third Junior Clerk

020 7420 9507

Our clerks’ room is open between:

8.30am – 6.30pm

Outside of these hours and in cases of urgency, please contact
Paul Bunting on 07971 843023 or
Darren Madle on 07769 714399.

Clerk contacts

Richard Sheehan

Deputy Senior Clerk

020 7420 9503
Oliver Ventura

First Junior Clerk

020 7420 9505
Aron Hanks

Second Junior Clerk

020 7420 9506
Archie Conners

Third Junior Clerk

020 7420 9507

Philipp v Barclays Bank PLC [2023] UKSC 25, article by William McCormick

On 12 July 2023 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Philipp v Barclays Bank which concerned the nature and extent of the duty of a bank (whether within the wider “Quincecare” duty or in addition to that duty) to protect a customer against falling victim to an Authorised Push Payment (APP) fraud. The outcome was a resounding victory for the Bank on the main issue accompanied by a robust (and largely unfavourable) analysis of the bases on which the “Quincecare” duty had been set up 30 years ago; adopted on various occasions since then, and extended by the Court of Appeal in the instant case.

The Facts    

In March 2018 the customer lost £700,000 which she had (on the basis of false statements made to her by a sophisticated fraudster) transferred to two bank accounts in the UAE. Attempts to recall the sums when the fraud had been recognised were unsuccessful.

Please click on this link to read the full article by William McCormick KC

To read the recent Supreme Court Judgment please click on this link.